John keats permanance vs temporality

Silence from the Past: Keats and Kierkegaard on Coldness and Temporality

Silence is the result of the very nature of the story, and not of its changes through time. So, going back to the poem by Shelley, one gets a deeper appreciation and understanding of the lengths Keats went to express the same abstract concept.

In effect, if the lines described are put side by side, the first poem expresses in simpler terms the same concept that the second poem expresses in more ambiguous or symbolic language.

Clearly, in these lines from the two poems the reader is forced to pay more attention to the craftiness of the Keats because of the complexity of the expression of theme in the lines.

Clearly, in these lines from the two poems the reader is forced to pay more attention to the craftiness of the Keats because of the complexity of John keats permanance vs temporality expression of theme in the lines. However, while these two texts both center upon a work of art which remains silent to the narrators and cannot be understood, the Urn, though analysed through a contemporary point of view, remains part of time and is determined by its historical context.

In the second poem, "Ode to a Nightingale," the transience of life and the tragedy of old age are set against the eternal renewal of the nightingale's flowing music. As discussed above, the only understanding the Poet can derive from the Urn lies in what is immediately observable--there is no possibility to go beyond what is perceived on the surface through understanding and rational inquiry.

In this stanza Keats, using personification, explains that melancholy is inseparable from beauty, which is transient, and from fleeting moments of happiness. This ode, which significantly concludes the set, expresses a vision of those beauties so characteristic of art, visions, which are incapable of gaining their effect unless perceived as fleeting.

John Keats: Permanance vs Temporality

Keats and the Senses of Being: She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss, For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair! As Keats sinks deeper into reverie, he is lifted out of himself and his immediate surroundings to partake of the sublime music of the nightingale's song.

This is the case with Abraham…there is one thing he cannot say and since he cannot say it, i. However, in many cases, there are poems that tackle the same theme from a different perspective while using various poetic devices to demonstrate how a better understanding of the theme can be achieved with certain poems complementing the use of these devices in other poems.

Only in the "silence" of that visionary remove from the "burning" and the "parching" of "breathing human passion" are we capable of being ideally alive to the "astonishing gift of being. Now, if these two poems are placed side by side it easily becomes clear that both poems used the same approach to achieve the desire intention of the poet.

The artworks which the narrators try to understand remain desperately silent, being unable to be understood by a contemporary viewer who cannot relate back to the context of the work.

John Keats: Permanance vs Temporality

The speaker opens with a description of his own degradation. This ode, which significantly concludes the set, expresses a vision of those beauties so characteristic of art, visions, which are incapable of gaining their effect unless perceived as fleeting.

Here the voice describes what is left of the monument that once represented the glory days of the ruler who is portrayed in the statue. However, while the Grecian Urn has been rendered different through passing time and the loss of the cultural context on which its significance depended, the story of Abraham is by nature incomprehensible and remains impossible to grasp, regardless of the universal context.

The ethical, according to Kierkegaard, is never changing, and as such, the story of Abraham is not part of the past but rather always remains present. The dialectical sense directs attention to two cardinal interrelated facets of the ode that fully emerge in the last stanza.

Paideia logo design by Janet L. Hence, the Urn is silent partly because of its cold, inexpressive nature, but also because it is taken out of its historical context. His idea of melancholy can be updated and classified as depression, an illness that can lead to suicide in its acute stages.

He is "too happy" that the nightingale sings. In the ode "To Autumn" author John Keats longs to have everlasting cyclic life such as that of the season, but he knows when he dies he can never come back. But he knows that he cannot do so for long. In this stanza Keats, using personification, explains that melancholy is inseparable from beauty, which is transient, and from fleeting moments of happiness.

In effect, if the lines described are put side by side, the first poem expresses in simpler terms the same concept that the second poem expresses in more ambiguous or symbolic language.

Hence, Abraham never could nor ever will be understood. Affirmatively, on the other hand, the progressive "othering" that occurs through the ode amounts to a pluralizing of being that contributes to a "community of irreducible," because equivocally cast, others.

The harshness of reality must soon intrude. Despite this having to refer to something else, such as the ability of inanimate objects to record history, it also directly translates into the simple matter of the temporality of abstract concepts and the permanence of concrete representations that very effectively freezes the abstract concepts in time.Philosophy of Literature.

Keats and the Senses of Being: "Ode on a Grecian Urn" (Stanza V) Phillip Stambovsky. ABSTRACT: With its focus on the pathos of permanence versus temporality as human aporia and on the function — the Werksein — of the work of art genuinely encountered, John Keats’s Ode on a Grecian Urn is a particularly compelling subject for philosophical analysis.

Keats and the Senses of Being: "Ode on a Grecian Urn" (Stanza V) ABSTRACT: With its focus on the pathos of permanence versus temporality as human aporia and on the function — the Werksein — of the work of art genuinely encountered, John Keats’s Ode on a Grecian Urn is a particularly compelling subject for philosophical analysis.

-the unchanging, eternal, inhuman (the star) vs. temporality of human sensual rapture -paradox: Keats' desire for permanence though he inhabits world in which passing of time occurs "La Belle Dame sans Merci", Keats.

FREE Comparing John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu Papers & Comparing John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu Essays at #1 ESSAYS BANK since ! BIGGEST and the BEST ESSAYS BANK. John Keats: Permanance vs Temporality theme in writer John Keats ' odes is the idea of permanence versus temporality.

They investigate the relationships, or barriers to relationship, between always changing human beings and the eternal, static and unalterable forces superior to humans.

Get an answer for 'Explain permanence verses mutability in the poem Ode to a Nightingale. ' and find homework help for other Ode to a Nightingale questions at eNotes.

Download
John keats permanance vs temporality
Rated 5/5 based on 77 review